They were already breaking modded hardware with firmware updates and banning accounts. The previous EULA covered it, just less explicitly. Just sharing what I learned researching this last week. My personal preference would be for the Switch to be flashable with any OS.
Nintendo Switch had an efuse system to prevent downgrading to earlier less secure versions of the OS but I don't remembering hearing that Nintendo was actively bricking anyone's Switch.
They would ban online use but I believe it would still work offline.
That's what I'd read: you would have a modded Switch, the firmware might break it (intentionally or not) and then you couldn't roll back. It didn't sound common.
They're probably bluffing to an extent, but just picture the dystopian scenario we're all heading towards: you're watching anything that's not {MegaCorporation or Government}-Approved Content™ on your TV and all of a sudden the screen goes dark and displays an ominous message, "This device has been permanently disabled due to non-approved usage. It will be retrieved by authorized personnel in the following days. Failing to comply will carry a serious fine. Thank you." Then you say "McDonald's! I'm lovin' it!" out loud so you can unlock your phone and proceed to complain on X before you're swatted by the police for doing so.
Sure, Nintendo definitely has the right to unilaterally and with no appeal or recourse, destroy a several hundred dollar device that you bought with your own money.
Nintendo claims the right to steal hundreds of dollars from you, permanently, with no notice or any hope of recovery.
Yep - never buying from them again. They've always been hostile to emulation but the past couple years have been even more ridiculous than normal from them. I don't need another Mario game while forking over yet more money that are user-hostile.
I know it won't place a dent in their profits, even if many of us who feel this way, since there are so many more people who just "wanna play the game" and don't know any of the politics of it. But this is still my personal stance, I just don't want to give a company like this money. Likewise, it's why I hopped off Windows, even though I really really thought they turned a new leaf with WSL, but Win11 Rolls around and ads & AI shoved in that I don't want.
I'm tired of giving corps what they want just because they're "the default". I'll live a cheaper life, with less FOMO. No skin off my back. Maybe this is just me getting old and dressing it up in a guise of moral superiority.
They were already breaking modded hardware with firmware updates and banning accounts. The previous EULA covered it, just less explicitly. Just sharing what I learned researching this last week. My personal preference would be for the Switch to be flashable with any OS.
Nintendo Switch had an efuse system to prevent downgrading to earlier less secure versions of the OS but I don't remembering hearing that Nintendo was actively bricking anyone's Switch.
They would ban online use but I believe it would still work offline.
That's what I'd read: you would have a modded Switch, the firmware might break it (intentionally or not) and then you couldn't roll back. It didn't sound common.
They already did that with the 3DS onwards.
For example, if you had a flash card in your 3DS and a new firmware update detected it Nintendo would happily brick the 3DS:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/nintendo-3ds-can-be-rem...
That article seemed pretty inconclusive.
They're probably bluffing to an extent, but just picture the dystopian scenario we're all heading towards: you're watching anything that's not {MegaCorporation or Government}-Approved Content™ on your TV and all of a sudden the screen goes dark and displays an ominous message, "This device has been permanently disabled due to non-approved usage. It will be retrieved by authorized personnel in the following days. Failing to comply will carry a serious fine. Thank you." Then you say "McDonald's! I'm lovin' it!" out loud so you can unlock your phone and proceed to complain on X before you're swatted by the police for doing so.
Sure, Nintendo definitely has the right to unilaterally and with no appeal or recourse, destroy a several hundred dollar device that you bought with your own money.
Nintendo claims the right to steal hundreds of dollars from you, permanently, with no notice or any hope of recovery.
Make sure to preorder switch 2!
Yep - never buying from them again. They've always been hostile to emulation but the past couple years have been even more ridiculous than normal from them. I don't need another Mario game while forking over yet more money that are user-hostile.
I know it won't place a dent in their profits, even if many of us who feel this way, since there are so many more people who just "wanna play the game" and don't know any of the politics of it. But this is still my personal stance, I just don't want to give a company like this money. Likewise, it's why I hopped off Windows, even though I really really thought they turned a new leaf with WSL, but Win11 Rolls around and ads & AI shoved in that I don't want.
I'm tired of giving corps what they want just because they're "the default". I'll live a cheaper life, with less FOMO. No skin off my back. Maybe this is just me getting old and dressing it up in a guise of moral superiority.
As the public has proven, time and time again: “It’s OK when Nintendo does it.”
Generally a fan of Nintendo’s game design sensibilities - generally not a fan of Nintendo’s business practices.
Still haven’t forgiven them for shitcanning AM2R