Why is there a premium version? Lungy did take a long time to make and there are ongoing costs even if no server currently. This work was pre-LLM - a lot of care and attention went into making it and it would not be viable in any way without some kind of monetisation.
That said, there is a lifetime access option, so no subscription, and the free version is good too.
Oh, common, don't twist the question, that's disingenuous. Not "a premium version". Why is it a subscription.
Why do think making people make recurrent payments for an otherwise static non-service app is reasonable?
$60 for a "lifetime" version is super steep, considering it's in the walled garden of the App Store, can't be backed up, can't be re-installed if it somehow disappears from the store, etc. For a desktop software it could potentially fly, but not for an iOS app.
I think there’s a misunderstanding - it’s not static, the exercises updated regularly and there are frequent updates, even if no server. As well as time and development costs, there are also ongoing costs from having an app live. If recurrent payments don’t work then there is a lifetime access option ($40), which is lower than many similar apps’ annual cost. I don’t think this is unreasonable at all.
I agree, hate how everything is a subscription now but $40 is a reasonable price for lifetime access.
For better or worse (mostly worse) developing an iPhone app isn't like making software for Windows XP where you ship it and it's done and will still run 20 years later with no additional work. There will no doubt be ongoing expenses and continued development work to keep it functional on new devices and new OS versions. So I get why subscriptions are a thing (especially since Apple has never allowed for paid upgrade pricing), the part I don't get is how so many of them think I want to spend $15/month forever on an IoT toaster that will revolutionize my bagel experience with AI.
Is this advice to help them maximize their business, or a personal whine that you want it but don’t want to pay so much?
Only the customers can tell this person if $60 is too much. If yure upset because it’s more than you would pay - say that. Otherwise you’re really just asking for a Porsche at the price of a Honda.
Serious question, have you tried to launch and sustain a consumer mobile business in the last 5 years? I have and the paid up front model is very difficult to make work. As much as users say they want to pay once, what they actually want is to pay once and receive a steady stream of features, improvements, updates for new iOS versions etc. The idea that there are no server-side expenses doesn't make a project like this static, iOS itself is a moving target for developers before you factor in user expectations from modern software.
Yes, we would do this for any medical device version - there is a hurdle of porting over all the shader code, but actually with LLMs it should be much easier. I'm not sure whether to go fully Android native, or cross platform though..
My experience is that Android users tend not to want to spend money on apps that much, even IAP is tricky. So sometimes it's not worth the hassle to go multi platform.
Considering it's a healthcare app, that PoV seems pretty daft and somewhat discriminatory. Catering to disabled people also isn't mega profitable, but we do it anyway.
An alternative PoV from me could be that going cross-platform means you can use the "rich users" iOS sales to subsidize the "poverty users" Android sales, same how our society does it with healthcare.
I see you are getting downvoted, but it's still true. An Android app brings in a fraction of the revenue. In case someone wants numbers: Look for the total revenue of Apple's App Store compared to the Play Store and then look for the total number of devices for each. It's a huge difference.
Of course a business will cater to the lucrative platform first or even exclusively.
And now, go ahead, downvote me as much as you want. Won't change the calculus though.
A friend of mine was working on this exact thing about 2 years ago in collaboration with the NHS before Google pulled half their stack out from under them. Incredibly sad on the whole but glad that it's happening in some form.
> We’re also close to finishing the medical device version - http://lungy.health - designed as a pulmonary rehab platform for patients with asthma, it should hopefully undergo early trials in the UK in 2026.
This sounds great. Maybe there could also be something to help people support an asthma attack, or a beginning one. Breathing can be hard folks.
Mostly saying this, because this brought up memories of a situation where a woman on a bus had the beginnings of an asthmatic attack and then realized she didn't have her inhalator on her and started to stress out. The poor bus driver had no idea what do to and also started to panic. So I ended up just being here, helping her remember techniques like the coachman seat, pursed lip breathing, all while I was kinda fighting that on one hand, my inhalator is an entirely standard inhalator, but on the same time, handing out prescription medication like that can be really, really dangerous.
Sounds like you did a really great job - seeing an asthma attack unfold can be scary, and you were right to be very cautious in sharing your medication.
So, the health version will more be a collection of simple interventions which hopefully improve symptom control and quality of life, more day-to-day control than in asthma attacks.
Having had an incentive spirometer prescribed for post-surgical use after being on bypass, my experience was that it seemed boring and like a waste of time, so anything that makes breathing exercises more engaging and feel more worthwhile is a win.
Hey, breathing exercises do seem to have quite a positive effect, and are very low cost and low risk - recent meta-analysis here [0]. One of the reasons the evidence base is so patchy, is that compliance is generally quite low, which is one of the reasons for making a digital platform that can map any benefit to how frequently patients use the platform.
The wellness version only creates an anonymised token to track installs - no other data is shared. The medical device version will be a separate app.
If someone said "having taken many doses of basically just water in my life, I can tell you that homeopathy is not 'bunk'" would you find that to be a convincing argument?
Me and my brethren have been using this tons :) I could most respectfully request a breathholding feature, hyping one up to hold ones breath for a minute and reminding to pass it left
In general, Lungy is more an active form of meditation, so rather than closing your eyes and listening to guided instructions or following a timer, it relies on the combination of real-time feedback (showing your breathing with interactive visuals) and the physiological effects of changing your breath pattern for relaxation. So, you focus on what is going on in the moment, as a form of mindfulness.
It's less 'cognitive' than other apps, but a few studies have shown breathing exercises are as effective for stress as guided meditation, but also much simpler to follow [0]. I'm always slightly surprised at how effective breathing is in helping relaxation - although it obviously makes a lot of physiological sense. So, Lungy is designed to make a practice simple / fun to do each day.
Hey,i'm trying it and just a sidenote : the french translation is atrocious (to the point where you may completely misunderstand the feature). I had to translate back to english in my head to try and find the original meaning.
A quick example : "detection de l'haleine" instead of "detection du souffle".
"Haleine" in french is mostly used to mean the "smell" of the breath. And i found examples like this in almost every screen.
Thanks for the reminder, I used to use Lungy a lot. Forgot about it.
I just tried v1 again, it blocks me from using it because it wants the microphone but I don’t want to give access. Can you make it optional in settings? Just following the visual is enough for me.
Don’t think it needed it when I used it. Does v2 also have the same issue?
Yep - it's now fully optional, I think probably just delete the old version and go through onboarding again (and select No Mic Access). You'll then get a sort of simulated breathing response, rather than the actual input.
I'm working on a meditation app, using an llm as a guide. It tracks your heart rate using the main camera of the phone, later will add breathing. Soon to be released.
Why is it a subscription?
* Why am I in gray? It's a reasonable thing to ask about an app with no server-side expenses.
Why is there a premium version? Lungy did take a long time to make and there are ongoing costs even if no server currently. This work was pre-LLM - a lot of care and attention went into making it and it would not be viable in any way without some kind of monetisation.
That said, there is a lifetime access option, so no subscription, and the free version is good too.
> Why is there a premium version?
Oh, common, don't twist the question, that's disingenuous. Not "a premium version". Why is it a subscription.
Why do think making people make recurrent payments for an otherwise static non-service app is reasonable?
$60 for a "lifetime" version is super steep, considering it's in the walled garden of the App Store, can't be backed up, can't be re-installed if it somehow disappears from the store, etc. For a desktop software it could potentially fly, but not for an iOS app.
I think there’s a misunderstanding - it’s not static, the exercises updated regularly and there are frequent updates, even if no server. As well as time and development costs, there are also ongoing costs from having an app live. If recurrent payments don’t work then there is a lifetime access option ($40), which is lower than many similar apps’ annual cost. I don’t think this is unreasonable at all.
I agree, hate how everything is a subscription now but $40 is a reasonable price for lifetime access.
For better or worse (mostly worse) developing an iPhone app isn't like making software for Windows XP where you ship it and it's done and will still run 20 years later with no additional work. There will no doubt be ongoing expenses and continued development work to keep it functional on new devices and new OS versions. So I get why subscriptions are a thing (especially since Apple has never allowed for paid upgrade pricing), the part I don't get is how so many of them think I want to spend $15/month forever on an IoT toaster that will revolutionize my bagel experience with AI.
The app is beautiful, but too expensive for me.
Is this advice to help them maximize their business, or a personal whine that you want it but don’t want to pay so much?
Only the customers can tell this person if $60 is too much. If yure upset because it’s more than you would pay - say that. Otherwise you’re really just asking for a Porsche at the price of a Honda.
Is this what you should have said, without couching in a way that makes it sound “official”? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44349932
Just don't buy it?
Just don't comment?
Isn't that legitimate to question a trend you disagree with? Especially on a web _forum_?
Serious question, have you tried to launch and sustain a consumer mobile business in the last 5 years? I have and the paid up front model is very difficult to make work. As much as users say they want to pay once, what they actually want is to pay once and receive a steady stream of features, improvements, updates for new iOS versions etc. The idea that there are no server-side expenses doesn't make a project like this static, iOS itself is a moving target for developers before you factor in user expectations from modern software.
$40 for lifetime access includes regular updates.
Any plans for an Android version? I'd love to try it, but I'm on the other side of the Apple App Store wall :(
Yes, we would do this for any medical device version - there is a hurdle of porting over all the shader code, but actually with LLMs it should be much easier. I'm not sure whether to go fully Android native, or cross platform though..
There are about 4-5 breathing apps on F-Droid if you don't mind something a bit less.
My experience is that Android users tend not to want to spend money on apps that much, even IAP is tricky. So sometimes it's not worth the hassle to go multi platform.
Considering it's a healthcare app, that PoV seems pretty daft and somewhat discriminatory. Catering to disabled people also isn't mega profitable, but we do it anyway.
An alternative PoV from me could be that going cross-platform means you can use the "rich users" iOS sales to subsidize the "poverty users" Android sales, same how our society does it with healthcare.
In billions, Q2 2024 Consumer App Spending v (total 2024 est. devices)
I see you are getting downvoted, but it's still true. An Android app brings in a fraction of the revenue. In case someone wants numbers: Look for the total revenue of Apple's App Store compared to the Play Store and then look for the total number of devices for each. It's a huge difference.
Of course a business will cater to the lucrative platform first or even exclusively.
And now, go ahead, downvote me as much as you want. Won't change the calculus though.
A friend of mine was working on this exact thing about 2 years ago in collaboration with the NHS before Google pulled half their stack out from under them. Incredibly sad on the whole but glad that it's happening in some form.
Ah was it based on SpiroSmart at all? It's a smartphone tech Google purchased in around 2017 [0].
Yep, it has been tricky to get over the line as a medical device and used in the NHS, hence the focus more on wellness initially.
[0] https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/alphabet-acquires-seno...
> We’re also close to finishing the medical device version - http://lungy.health - designed as a pulmonary rehab platform for patients with asthma, it should hopefully undergo early trials in the UK in 2026.
This sounds great. Maybe there could also be something to help people support an asthma attack, or a beginning one. Breathing can be hard folks.
Mostly saying this, because this brought up memories of a situation where a woman on a bus had the beginnings of an asthmatic attack and then realized she didn't have her inhalator on her and started to stress out. The poor bus driver had no idea what do to and also started to panic. So I ended up just being here, helping her remember techniques like the coachman seat, pursed lip breathing, all while I was kinda fighting that on one hand, my inhalator is an entirely standard inhalator, but on the same time, handing out prescription medication like that can be really, really dangerous.
Give this[1] a read, it's good to now :)
1: https://www.pari.com/int/blog/breathing-excercise-asthma/
Sounds like you did a really great job - seeing an asthma attack unfold can be scary, and you were right to be very cautious in sharing your medication.
So, the health version will more be a collection of simple interventions which hopefully improve symptom control and quality of life, more day-to-day control than in asthma attacks.
Why are you linking your app to anxiety and stress for V2? The earlier launch post had no mention of that.
I recall the original post about Lungy.
Having had an incentive spirometer prescribed for post-surgical use after being on bypass, my experience was that it seemed boring and like a waste of time, so anything that makes breathing exercises more engaging and feel more worthwhile is a win.
Yes, exactly - that's what I saw working on post-op wards – the spirometer would just sort of sit on the bedside and collect dust.
What medical research is this based on? Isn't general breathing exercises, generally bunk?
edit: Having any medical-adjacent app collect any data for the use of advertising (according to the app page) seems really wrong.
Hey, breathing exercises do seem to have quite a positive effect, and are very low cost and low risk - recent meta-analysis here [0]. One of the reasons the evidence base is so patchy, is that compliance is generally quite low, which is one of the reasons for making a digital platform that can map any benefit to how frequently patients use the platform.
The wellness version only creates an anonymised token to track installs - no other data is shared. The medical device version will be a separate app.
[0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39477355/
Having done plenty of yoga in my life, I can tell you that breathing exercises are not "bunk."
If someone said "having taken many doses of basically just water in my life, I can tell you that homeopathy is not 'bunk'" would you find that to be a convincing argument?
I think yoga might be a confounding variable in that case.
Me and my brethren have been using this tons :) I could most respectfully request a breathholding feature, hyping one up to hold ones breath for a minute and reminding to pass it left
How would you compare to a general meditation app like “Waking Up” curious if you’ve used it.
In general, Lungy is more an active form of meditation, so rather than closing your eyes and listening to guided instructions or following a timer, it relies on the combination of real-time feedback (showing your breathing with interactive visuals) and the physiological effects of changing your breath pattern for relaxation. So, you focus on what is going on in the moment, as a form of mindfulness.
It's less 'cognitive' than other apps, but a few studies have shown breathing exercises are as effective for stress as guided meditation, but also much simpler to follow [0]. I'm always slightly surprised at how effective breathing is in helping relaxation - although it obviously makes a lot of physiological sense. So, Lungy is designed to make a practice simple / fun to do each day.
[0] https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2023/02/cyclic-sighin...
I remember this one: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.hakjav.hel...
When I was a boy they called that “biofeedback”. Damn kids ruin everything.
Hahaha - we are adding in HRV & heart rate tracking - then I think we can officially call it 'biofeedback' :)
What would be the advantages of this over, say, setting a timer and doing box breathing?
I tried this when it first came out but it always felt gimmicky and didn’t work randomly Will give it another try
Great idea and ux
Cool, thanks - its had quite a few updates since then. Will be interested to hear what you think.
FDA approval pending?
yep - it would be MHRA (UK) initially
Hey,i'm trying it and just a sidenote : the french translation is atrocious (to the point where you may completely misunderstand the feature). I had to translate back to english in my head to try and find the original meaning.
A quick example : "detection de l'haleine" instead of "detection du souffle".
"Haleine" in french is mostly used to mean the "smell" of the breath. And i found examples like this in almost every screen.
Oh, thank you for pointing that out!
If you notice any more typos / terrible translations please send to hello [at] lungy [dot] app and I'll get them fixed. Thank you!
Thanks for the reminder, I used to use Lungy a lot. Forgot about it.
I just tried v1 again, it blocks me from using it because it wants the microphone but I don’t want to give access. Can you make it optional in settings? Just following the visual is enough for me.
Don’t think it needed it when I used it. Does v2 also have the same issue?
Yep - it's now fully optional, I think probably just delete the old version and go through onboarding again (and select No Mic Access). You'll then get a sort of simulated breathing response, rather than the actual input.
I'm working on a meditation app, using an llm as a guide. It tracks your heart rate using the main camera of the phone, later will add breathing. Soon to be released.