Okay, firstly you we use SEC and a few other datasets from Google and similar datasets. We filter them based on credibility. The research papers are pulled from a corpus called Semantic Scholar which is pretty high quality. We also do ArXiv and PubMed.
Thanks for proving our point for us. People will do whatever they want. Some of us are smart enough to check the truth, but most of us are not. There’s a need for fact checking and hopefully, people can come to a consensus on that.
Biased towards whatever the hell someone wants to portray. Truth is no longer displayed, what’s displayed is only what you want. HN is one of the better platforms and so you can tell. What about the others where bots dominate?
Can you expand more on what "proprietary datasets" means...? Where are the research papers pulled from?
Edit: it's also immediately obvious the number of brand new accounts that are engaging in the comments here with generic comments.
Okay, firstly you we use SEC and a few other datasets from Google and similar datasets. We filter them based on credibility. The research papers are pulled from a corpus called Semantic Scholar which is pretty high quality. We also do ArXiv and PubMed.
Ferrari is losing coz of its strategy. Please fact check it
Sorry. They’re just ass.
Sounds interesting, can you tell me more about the claim generation?.
We use some peer reviewed methods to identify questionable claims.
How long does it take for a claim to be verified?
Can it fact check articles, posts etc?
Yes. Please install. You can see it!
What does it conclude about the full and complete comment histories of these three accounts?
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=ka2429
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=shrishti12
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=AddySmith2410
Is there are word to describe that behaviour?
Thanks for proving our point for us. People will do whatever they want. Some of us are smart enough to check the truth, but most of us are not. There’s a need for fact checking and hopefully, people can come to a consensus on that.
Can it also check "Show HN" posts with suspicious amounts of simple replies made by suspiciously-new user accounts?
lol we’re trying to prove that the internet is biased.
Biased towards what is the far more important question
Biased towards whatever the hell someone wants to portray. Truth is no longer displayed, what’s displayed is only what you want. HN is one of the better platforms and so you can tell. What about the others where bots dominate?
I'd like it to be biased towards objective facts and not hurting people, how about that?
ah man they got us. we thought it was spam when it was a social experiment all along. now look whos got egg on their face.
Can it be integrated with social media platforms? Since that is where most misinformation is circulated