This is not what the court said, the court ruled 2 to 1, that the food/calorie intake should be monitored, not that it is below what was defined.
It says nothing against the change of menu for the prisoners accused of terrorism after the Oct 7 nor that it's not ok for it to be different from the criminal prisoners menu.
This is not what the court said, the court ruled 2 to 1, that the food/calorie intake should be monitored, not that it is below what was defined.
It says nothing against the change of menu for the prisoners accused of terrorism after the Oct 7 nor that it's not ok for it to be different from the criminal prisoners menu.
But that won't get the guardian views..
[flagged]
[flagged]
wow I would really like to know what exactly you would define as a genocidal acts against the so called israelis
[flagged]