> We recognize that promoting safety for young people is a shared responsibility, and we support the idea of collective action to protect children from online risks.
> South Dakota and Wyoming have also passed online safety laws that impose requirements on services like ours. These are very similar to the requirements of the UK Online Safety Act. So, as we did in the UK, we’ll enable Kids Web Services’ (KWS) age verification solution for users in these states.
Disappointed to see them bend the knee. Don’t these verification requirements force everyone, not just kids, to lose anonymity? How can this be constitutional in America given the first and fourth amendment?
> We recognize that promoting safety for young people is a shared responsibility, and we support the idea of collective action to protect children from online risks.
> South Dakota and Wyoming have also passed online safety laws that impose requirements on services like ours. These are very similar to the requirements of the UK Online Safety Act. So, as we did in the UK, we’ll enable Kids Web Services’ (KWS) age verification solution for users in these states.
Disappointed to see them bend the knee. Don’t these verification requirements force everyone, not just kids, to lose anonymity? How can this be constitutional in America given the first and fourth amendment?