10 points | by alexnewman 3 hours ago ago
1 comments
> In practice, human annotation remains more accurate and, in many cases, more cost-effective, particularly when high precision is required
There's no data for this in the article. I'd be surprised if humans genuinely cost less per image, so it would be good to see this.
> In practice, human annotation remains more accurate and, in many cases, more cost-effective, particularly when high precision is required
There's no data for this in the article. I'd be surprised if humans genuinely cost less per image, so it would be good to see this.