2 points | by zdw 11 hours ago ago
2 comments
The main argument of this article is:
- As the current programming approach involves a skilled human working with a computer assistant,
- And given that US AI tools are less dependable during peak hours,
There's an advantage in pairing the computer assistant with a programmer in a time zone 12 hours apart.
> No individual human can work as fast or as consistently as a LLM
“Consistent” isn’t the first adjective which comes to mind when discussing LLMs. It’s not even the twentieth. Unless we’re discussing “lack of”.
The main argument of this article is:
- As the current programming approach involves a skilled human working with a computer assistant,
- And given that US AI tools are less dependable during peak hours,
There's an advantage in pairing the computer assistant with a programmer in a time zone 12 hours apart.
> No individual human can work as fast or as consistently as a LLM
“Consistent” isn’t the first adjective which comes to mind when discussing LLMs. It’s not even the twentieth. Unless we’re discussing “lack of”.