The ironic part is, that i often find human readable changes (or slightly faster) better for coding, then a LLM that spends x time thinking and then dumps all the information/changes in one go.
It allows me to monitor the progress, pauze/stop the changes, maybe undo a bad change, and instruct it to fix or add context.
Having a LLM that is ultra fast sounds great, until you need to undo a ton of bad changes. Programming even with a LLM, is still about understanding the changes being done to the code base.
If you only program in non-attenuative mode, and act on the total sum of the changes, you need to be darn sure that your start prompt is very detailed to anticipate the LLMs behavior.
The ironic part is, that i often find human readable changes (or slightly faster) better for coding, then a LLM that spends x time thinking and then dumps all the information/changes in one go.
It allows me to monitor the progress, pauze/stop the changes, maybe undo a bad change, and instruct it to fix or add context.
Having a LLM that is ultra fast sounds great, until you need to undo a ton of bad changes. Programming even with a LLM, is still about understanding the changes being done to the code base.
If you only program in non-attenuative mode, and act on the total sum of the changes, you need to be darn sure that your start prompt is very detailed to anticipate the LLMs behavior.