> Accusing the IEA of behaving like a "climate advocacy organization," Wright urged it to focus on "energy security."
Sure seems pretty insecure to shackle yourself to a finite resource that is harder and harder to obtain while producing more and more toxic pollution. Even if you literally don't believe that the climate is real, the endless free and easy to obtain energy from the sky is simply a more secure source, followed closely by the endless free energy blowing around in the air.
> Accusing the IEA of behaving like a "climate advocacy organization," Wright urged it to focus on "energy security."
Sure seems pretty insecure to shackle yourself to a finite resource that is harder and harder to obtain while producing more and more toxic pollution. Even if you literally don't believe that the climate is real, the endless free and easy to obtain energy from the sky is simply a more secure source, followed closely by the endless free energy blowing around in the air.
China will take their spot.