10 points | by anonymousiam 7 hours ago ago
1 comments
Previously discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643407 with greater intellectual honesty than this tabloid of a post. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis...
> When the editors closed the discussion that ended his run it wasn’t that they concluded that he broke an explicit rule.
That's false. Behaviors associated with a "NOT HERE" determination are explicitly against the rules.
I'm also going to add that reclaimthenet.org is not a reliable source:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44953549
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23276430
Previously discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643407 with greater intellectual honesty than this tabloid of a post. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis...
> When the editors closed the discussion that ended his run it wasn’t that they concluded that he broke an explicit rule.
That's false. Behaviors associated with a "NOT HERE" determination are explicitly against the rules.
I'm also going to add that reclaimthenet.org is not a reliable source:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44953549
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23276430