Never thought I'd see the day the NYT editorial board take this stance. Not because it's extreme in any way, but because it is fundamentally at odds with the belief that racially disparate outcomes must be the result of intentional racism.
They let Janet Napolitano off easy though. No follow up question after she admits that her decision was wrong?
Never thought I'd see the day the NYT editorial board take this stance. Not because it's extreme in any way, but because it is fundamentally at odds with the belief that racially disparate outcomes must be the result of intentional racism.
They let Janet Napolitano off easy though. No follow up question after she admits that her decision was wrong?