The issue I have with loops is that for truly complex work, where I care about building a generalized solution for a complex problem, the agents frequently reward hack and end up burning indefinitely without finishing until I step in.
Fascinating. I think it's the first time I've heard it put that way.
For me it's more intuitive the other way around, as the "outer" loops increase in complexity (and can have additional separate loops running inside them). It also makes sense because you can always add more (meta) loops that way.
there are more than 3: https://www.latent.space/p/loopcraft
The issue I have with loops is that for truly complex work, where I care about building a generalized solution for a complex problem, the agents frequently reward hack and end up burning indefinitely without finishing until I step in.
Curious how you're addressing this
Totally. Earth's rotation is a loop too. We should count that.
rotation and orbit, and technically the eccentricity in the axis as well
Aren't the loops the wrong way round in the diagram. The tightest loop is the inference loop, then the tool loop and then human loop?
You are absolutely correct. It's an i18n/l10n issue. They spin in the opposite direction in the other hemisphere.
I think of them from the outside in, so that's why I illustrated it that way.
Fascinating. I think it's the first time I've heard it put that way.
For me it's more intuitive the other way around, as the "outer" loops increase in complexity (and can have additional separate loops running inside them). It also makes sense because you can always add more (meta) loops that way.
[dead]
[dead]