There's no time to write a readme after writing 48k lines in less than two days (not including "Initial commit from create-turbo", "first commit", and "initial commit")
I don’t any experience with CRMs, but I’ve had some discussions with a coworker about a skunk works project idea: mining our emails for “incidents” from our client’s representatives. Most of our emails falls into one bucket: sharing, or explaining some financial data. Once I a while there is an issue. Big issues flow up the chain of command. Small issues are knocked out. The question is, are these frequent but small issues indicative of a gap in our management. We don’t know what the other party is saying or thinking amongst themselves. There could be a simmering problem.
I’m still trying to get my head around what the heck we could do about it.
So I read this,
“…reports that something happened — a thread was ingested, a company was created, an attendee is unknown — by writing a row to a queue. The agent leases that row and decides what it means.”
I’m thinking, hmm. Yes. Something did happen. I want to know, what kind of something? how often does it happen?
I start to get upset stomach thinking this could be used against me in a court of boss’s opinions.
So my application is all skunk works. But is what I’m trying to understand “CRM” as you know it? Tangent of it?
Just cant believe AI slop is getting 1k stars on github in two days. Nothing really innovative about this project, nothing you cannot do yourself in two days with a coding agent.
I wrote it before, OSS is changing in a way that will basically make it useless.
Hey, highly critical feedback incoming!
Worst CRM product name of all time, &:
Ironic after scrolling through the readme just wishing you’d wrote it yourself.There’s a CRM called “Less annoying CRM” as I found out when searching for something like that a while ago.
https://www.lessannoyingcrm.com/
There's no time to write a readme after writing 48k lines in less than two days (not including "Initial commit from create-turbo", "first commit", and "initial commit")
The readme on this project is nonsensical, and seems to be full of trivial errors. Example:
> CONTEXT_DEV_API_KEY Company logo, industry and socials from a domain.
It makes sense to me, but I have some prior CRM context.
My interpretation is:
Context.dev service API key to retrieve company logo, industry, and socials for a company domain […that agent had identified]
I don’t any experience with CRMs, but I’ve had some discussions with a coworker about a skunk works project idea: mining our emails for “incidents” from our client’s representatives. Most of our emails falls into one bucket: sharing, or explaining some financial data. Once I a while there is an issue. Big issues flow up the chain of command. Small issues are knocked out. The question is, are these frequent but small issues indicative of a gap in our management. We don’t know what the other party is saying or thinking amongst themselves. There could be a simmering problem.
I’m still trying to get my head around what the heck we could do about it.
So I read this,
“…reports that something happened — a thread was ingested, a company was created, an attendee is unknown — by writing a row to a queue. The agent leases that row and decides what it means.”
I’m thinking, hmm. Yes. Something did happen. I want to know, what kind of something? how often does it happen?
I start to get upset stomach thinking this could be used against me in a court of boss’s opinions.
So my application is all skunk works. But is what I’m trying to understand “CRM” as you know it? Tangent of it?
Just cant believe AI slop is getting 1k stars on github in two days. Nothing really innovative about this project, nothing you cannot do yourself in two days with a coding agent.
I wrote it before, OSS is changing in a way that will basically make it useless.
And Github doesn't let us see stargazers anymore, so we can't tell which repos bought stars.