“Who Governs Autonomous AI Execution? — Execution Governance AI (EGA) V9: A Deterministic Runtime Governance Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous Workflows”
I'm now preparing to submit this work to arXiv. As an independent researcher without an academic network, my submission requires endorsement from an eligible arXiv author in the relevant category.
If you're eligible to endorse in the relevant arXiv category and are willing to take a look at the paper, please reach out:
contact@lcm3.com
Any help would be sincerely appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Today I published a preprint of my paper:
“Who Governs Autonomous AI Execution? — Execution Governance AI (EGA) V9: A Deterministic Runtime Governance Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous Workflows”
Available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22003768 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22003768
I'm now preparing to submit this work to arXiv. As an independent researcher without an academic network, my submission requires endorsement from an eligible arXiv author in the relevant category.
If you're eligible to endorse in the relevant arXiv category and are willing to take a look at the paper, please reach out:
contact@lcm3.com
Any help would be sincerely appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Publish on your own site, why do you need arxiv? What conference or journal is it going into? You already have a doi.
https://openreview.net/ would be a better venue for your paper
> EGA V9 achieved 100% detection performance with 0% false-positive and false-negative rates
This is a big red flag, you should double check your work or reevaluate your evaluation data. No one gets a perfect score
There is no related work section, no comparison to existing methods. Gaps from standard research papers
Aside from the contents, peddling for endorsements is faux pas on HN