Ingesting since 8? Not advised for growing brains.
It's not that it's too strong. Anyone can take weak flower and make strong edibles pretty easily. It's just available.
if older weeds were half as "strong", the user could just smoke 2x as much and become just as high as with newer weeds. So everyone had access to the same highs, some might just need to take an extra hit or two. so its bad faith to say weed is too strong.
heres the kicker, they try to scare u even harder with 70% vapes... oooo 70 is way bigger than 10. But vapes give micro doses, so the user has to suck on the vape all day to get the same high as 10% flower.
This is the same bs arguments the authorities always make againt ending prohibitions...
This aint even ur daddys weed , its waaaay stronger and more dangerous.... so we should continue to treat smokers as criminals.
Ingesting since 8? Not advised for growing brains. It's not that it's too strong. Anyone can take weak flower and make strong edibles pretty easily. It's just available.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/opinion/weed-marijuna-chi...
https://archive.is/H9zBR
This article is just bait.
it says ... decades ago, 10%, now 20%, vapes 70%.
this is a bullshit fact.
if older weeds were half as "strong", the user could just smoke 2x as much and become just as high as with newer weeds. So everyone had access to the same highs, some might just need to take an extra hit or two. so its bad faith to say weed is too strong.
heres the kicker, they try to scare u even harder with 70% vapes... oooo 70 is way bigger than 10. But vapes give micro doses, so the user has to suck on the vape all day to get the same high as 10% flower.
This is the same bs arguments the authorities always make againt ending prohibitions...
This aint even ur daddys weed , its waaaay stronger and more dangerous.... so we should continue to treat smokers as criminals.
[dead]