bad outcomes -> drastic societal changes -> we get to 2.5C anyway, but with some sort of dystopia attached.
The bad outcomes doesn't have to be uniformly and evenly distributed. There will be a lot of people negatively affected, and some people that will take advantage of that.
I'm not sure if there's even a realistic pathway to keep it below 2.5C without drastic societal changes
bad outcomes -> drastic societal changes -> we get to 2.5C anyway, but with some sort of dystopia attached.
The bad outcomes doesn't have to be uniformly and evenly distributed. There will be a lot of people negatively affected, and some people that will take advantage of that.