"Welcome to my distro-hopping adventure, you're all invited!"
> Rejected approaches: home-manager for user configs: it would make ~/.config a farm of read-only symlinks into the store, which is the opposite of Omarchy's "your files" philosophy
What in the world of AI sycophancy is this? Omarchy's "philosophy" is what caused this dotfile disaster to reach for a lifeboat in the first place.
Surely it is better to correct course than to avoid fixing the problem just because it would be hard. I do think that specific fix will be a hard sell, but you shouldn’t mock them just for considering it.
And to characterize it as a “disaster” when it is merely a problem that worries them shows your own bias.
Oh wait, talking again about that fascist ideologist? https://world.hey.com/dhh/as-i-remember-london-e7d38e64
"Welcome to my distro-hopping adventure, you're all invited!"
> Rejected approaches: home-manager for user configs: it would make ~/.config a farm of read-only symlinks into the store, which is the opposite of Omarchy's "your files" philosophy
What in the world of AI sycophancy is this? Omarchy's "philosophy" is what caused this dotfile disaster to reach for a lifeboat in the first place.
Surely it is better to correct course than to avoid fixing the problem just because it would be hard. I do think that specific fix will be a hard sell, but you shouldn’t mock them just for considering it.
And to characterize it as a “disaster” when it is merely a problem that worries them shows your own bias.