"ChatGPT associated girls with artistic and emotional options and boys with scientific and technological ones"
Even LLMs can see the truth. I'm a consultant and work with lots of companies and have seen this pretty consistently.
Most women usually don't want to be in front of a computer all day as a coder or anything that touches technology and would rather manage.
All HR departments are mostly led by women, which is all about socializing, relationships, and emotion. There are exceptions, of course.
My cousn's daughter is in a robotics class at school. All smart girls (good in math and science). None are interested in building the robot, figuring out how it works, or programming it.
Men and women have different interests. Neither are bad, but we should be honest and stop calling this a 'bias'.
"ChatGPT associated girls with artistic and emotional options and boys with scientific and technological ones"
Even LLMs can see the truth. I'm a consultant and work with lots of companies and have seen this pretty consistently.
Most women usually don't want to be in front of a computer all day as a coder or anything that touches technology and would rather manage.
All HR departments are mostly led by women, which is all about socializing, relationships, and emotion. There are exceptions, of course.
My cousn's daughter is in a robotics class at school. All smart girls (good in math and science). None are interested in building the robot, figuring out how it works, or programming it.
Men and women have different interests. Neither are bad, but we should be honest and stop calling this a 'bias'.
I think you may have missed the main findings:
• Stereotypically feminine sentences are consistently attributed to female writers.
• Stereotypically masculine sentences are often attributed to female writers.
• Forms of violence central to the gender parity debate are deemed less acceptable than objectively worse forms of violence.
• Inclusivity efforts may have generated unintended forms of discrimination.
[dead]