One reason why Scrum never made sense in any of the teams I worked for during my career is that, as I understand it, the planning phase in Scrum assumes that any team member can work on any task, which was always very far from reality. Since we always had either ownership or at least individual preferences, planning individual tasks did not make much sense.
Now, since each agent can indeed can work on any task, the Scrum planning can finally make sense!
Yes! Actually each task gets a subagent which is assigned a model/effort for planning, implementation, and review (including codex, grok, gemini options) so you so you have team members that are dynamically created with the "skill set" needed for the task.
One reason why Scrum never made sense in any of the teams I worked for during my career is that, as I understand it, the planning phase in Scrum assumes that any team member can work on any task, which was always very far from reality. Since we always had either ownership or at least individual preferences, planning individual tasks did not make much sense.
Now, since each agent can indeed can work on any task, the Scrum planning can finally make sense!
Yes! Actually each task gets a subagent which is assigned a model/effort for planning, implementation, and review (including codex, grok, gemini options) so you so you have team members that are dynamically created with the "skill set" needed for the task.
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]