You're absolutely right to question it. And here is where it gets interesting -- they probably talked to Claude enough to start talking like Claude without even realizing it.
For fucks sake this reeks of being written by an LLM, but not the usual Claude or ChatGPT vibe - probably Meta's own AI. Endearing to see it's also going for the "load-bearing" trap.
> The protocol is finished, the servers are appearing, the client implementations exist.
Besides "load-bearing", I also do not understand the fondness of LLMs for "lands".
While the LLM verbal tics are annoying, the content of this Meta article, which is about the newer NTP-related RFCs, RFC 8915 and RFC 9769, and also the Meta open-source time repository, are useful.
> Today it is load-bearing:
Please no.
You're absolutely right to question it. And here is where it gets interesting -- they probably talked to Claude enough to start talking like Claude without even realizing it.
Can Hacker News PLEASE add a no-human filter? Reads as AI on first pass, but missing proper em dash names the author. Verdict: dead giveaway.
Just a lot of slop juice...
For fucks sake this reeks of being written by an LLM, but not the usual Claude or ChatGPT vibe - probably Meta's own AI. Endearing to see it's also going for the "load-bearing" trap.
Usually the one that writes the code writes the blog post.
> ... or whenever a correction lands
> The protocol is finished, the servers are appearing, the client implementations exist.
Besides "load-bearing", I also do not understand the fondness of LLMs for "lands".
While the LLM verbal tics are annoying, the content of this Meta article, which is about the newer NTP-related RFCs, RFC 8915 and RFC 9769, and also the Meta open-source time repository, are useful.
Some guy: "Muse, have a Claude 4x model write up the post. Sound human".
Quarterly meeting: "Internal Muse adoption has been skyrocketing and really being a force multiplier in..."
Utter AI bollocks.