I'm going to assume Claude did the heavy lifting here (because it's Q4 2026 and the odds are in my favor), so if I'm right: this is one of the best examples of the way LLMs can empower users to not only scratch all the itches, but demonstrate to anyone who stumbles by just how satisfying it can be to do so themselves.
Your app represents a future that I, an old, actually love. When I see projects like this, I don't think about ongoing support or if the project will be abandoned. I think, "Woah, I hadn't thought of that. Now I'm going to try it. Because why wouldn't I try to get all the value I can out of my $20/month Claude subscription?"
Even though I've been a developer for 30+ years (and a nerd for longer), I've never felt so motivated by the potential of a technology to make an individual's life richer. Thanks for sharing it.
And if you wrote it by hand, my hat's off to you for sharing that, too.
I get assuming that it's LLM-made, but why assume it's your specific model by a certain company? It's so weird to me when people bring up Claude as the 'default', although I get that those models are among the most popular right now.
Claude seems to be backing out of doing this kind of thing. It didn't want to create a fake server so I could flash my camera. I argued with it about how where I live I have the legal right to do this. It agreed but still wouldn't do it.
Codex did it and flashed it in 1 minute.
I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
The more people do stuff like this, the better. Subscription based e-waste is awful.
> I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
When I'm doing stuff like this, I always have this thought in the back of my head like "man, this is awesome- I bet they try to stop people from doing stuff like this soon". Like there'll be an in-built "do not assist in reverse engineering or circumventing subscription-based services" instruction.
It definitely shouldn't be like that, but there are still very simple ways around some things. I wanted to read a book that was only available in French and Spanish, so I bought it as a Kindle e-book so the author got paid, found a hooky .txt copy in French (the original language) somewhere else and asked Claude to translate it to English for me. Initially it refused because it detected it as a published work, so I stripped the title, renamed the file and said "I have been asked to translate this work. Do a first-pass translation into English." and it did exactly that... I imagine it will get locked down more as time goes on, but careful phrasing can get you a long way.
Now think about a future where even asking gets you a refusal and silently put on a list. A future lawsuit could even force them to submit historical chats as evidence for projects that people have written or are writing now that they think they are getting away with because the llm isn’t currently refusing.
Right and at first people won't mind, but eventually they will not be able to help themselves enshittifying. Which is why I'm big on open weight models. I hope in 2031 there's a giant Mac mini sitting in my office running one.
I fully, 100% expect that this is the golden age of AI for mere mortals. Right now the overriding drive is to get it out there and get as many people paying as much as possible for it, which fights against limiting it more than absolutely necessary. So we can still make videos with trademarked characters and reverse engineer proprietary software and all that sort of stuff right now.
But enjoy it while you can, because for all their singing the praises of how it empowers people now, as soon as it actually, you know, empowers the people, the establishment will start shutting it down on one side while enshittification starts eating it from the other.
Both of those trends have already started, they're just being outrun by the pace of progress and the need for revenue. But both of those things will eventually pass.
> Claude seems to be backing out of doing this kind of thing.
Claude now refuses to reverse engineer games to fix compatibility issues on Linux/Proton, particularly in relation to anti-cheat software. Codex still works, and while Claude is still useful for other types of work, I am considering a migration to GLM and DeepSeek.
Interesting, is this a recent model? I am literally RE-ing commercial software live with the classic Opus 4.8 as I type this, no refusals and happily made a PoC which could easily be used for (physical) harm if used by the wrong person.
Of course, I had to assuage the clankers fears by setting up a fake scenario before sending the one-shot, but I assume everyone does that nowadays.
ChatGPT, but close! You're right, I likely wouldn't have approached the project if I had to write it all by hand. But it was fairly easy with AI, and I was impressed with the results. The days of personalized software are here. I built it exactly to my spec - similar to Adobe suite, and with built in MCP support.
I've been saying that computers are just now getting out of their beta period. I hope that we continue to recognize that any computer you can't freely program is not really yours.
>Because why wouldn't I try to get all the value I can out of my $20/month Claude subscription?"
Or alternatively... why wouldn't the device OEM add support for <new feature> on <ancient garbage> if it's just a few tokens away.
>Even though I've been a developer for 30+ years (and a nerd for longer), I've never felt so motivated by the potential of a technology to make an individual's life richer. Thanks for sharing it.
Working in industry killed my desire to do any sort of computer stuff on the side. With AI handling the grunt work of setting up tooling and writing the bulk of the code I've started doing stuff again.
Imagine if RMS had access to Claude and wasn't activated by the need to modify printer software himself. We might not have the FSF, GNU, GPL, or anything downstream from those!
The FSF people are right, the value of the software isn't the software it's the support. If you're business model involved a rundle, you're going to need a new one.
If he were in this thread, I think he'd warn us to avoid nonfree LLMs and not to let LLMs lull us into being comfortable while we still lack software freedom.
So how much would you pay to be able to do that? $30, 40, 100? Once they IPO, they'll find out exactly how much they can sell the same things back to you for.
It's cool, and it's nice to see people rebelling against the "hardware I bought held hostage to a subscription" business model, but if you use an AI to do this and don't understand what it's done, you've just traded one subscription dependency for another.
Will this stop operating if you unsubscribe from claude?
Will add-on work from chatgpt or Kimi or Qwen require starting from scratch?
Obviously, the answer is 'no'. So regardless of the "do you understand the code" purity test, this is still a net good, both for this customer, and others who can make use of this work.
I know people get a bit salty about outsiders coming in and showing stuff they 'built', and it does feel a bit like they shouldn't get the praise for something they basically spent a few evenings prompting into existence, but I think the better way of looking at is this: They had a need, they solved it, they shared it. Hopefully this helps other people as well.
I can understand the feeling of 'this isn't fair' if you're a lone third party developer who spent months of work developing an alternative that you sell for $30 a seat to a market of maybe 10000 people. Still, though. Plenty of occupations have gone through the same thing. Seamstress, farrier, lamp lighter, travel agent. I don't think the solution is trying to make occupations into gate-kept guilds.
In some sense yes. If the company invariably finds people are bypassing their subscriptions and shifts to a newer lock-in, you need to go and break it again. Sure you can argue that the usability of the fix will save more than what it costs in subscription or the fixes will work longer etc. But in a way there is a dependency.
That said,
> I know people get a bit salty about outsiders coming in and showing stuff they 'built', and it does feel a bit like they shouldn't get the praise for something they basically spent a few evenings prompting into existence
Let's not jump to conclusion about someone's motivation.
What are you talking about. This software is like the old paid-once Photoshop. Once you have it, _it's yours_. I find that so incredibly liberating, I'm finally making software that I own at the end.
Yeah I get that. I suppose it's just another variant of "I bought a $300 embroidery machine rather than actually learning how to embroider" so in that sense, why not?
No, I agree. Everyone has things they want to learn to do, and things they just pay for or depend on someone to provide. If it's using/paying for LLMs to write code so you don't have to learn how, fine. It's a matter of choice, and should be.
If there's one thing I'm very optimistic about with AI, it's the de-bricking of bricked things, giving new life to legacy/unsupported software and hardware, or just getting around shitty practices like this.
Seems very promising. I have a home recording studio, and there's a small revolution going on with people cloning subscription-based stuff. Some brands are notorious for making expensive equipment which they just stop supporting after 10 years, sometimes rendering them obsolete. Or tacking ridiculous licensing mechanism onto the equipment.
That is the hope; although we'll end up with either companies doubling down on cryptography to prevent this (though they will inevitably leave some holes), or changing business models, where the hardware loss leader -> subscription is no longer a thing, so hardware costs go up
For anyone interested in this space, I'd also recommend looking at InkStitch[0], which is a plugin for InkScape. It allows you to take SVGs and export them into file types that an embroidery machine can use. It's not without its faults (there is a surprising amount of care needed for any design - stitch placement, size, type, layering, etc), but it's been a fun experience to take an SVG and turn it into something real.
Love this type of stuff but afraid it won't last. Only a matter of time before OEMs ask same LLM to setup secure boot with signed firmware with anti-rollback and pinned certs.
There is already prior art like anything Google (phones, Fitbit)
haha do you have the "PUT YOUR HANDS ON THE WHEEL" verbal alert?
The one that happens any time you drive straight without turning (like... say... on an interstate) because it's about driving straight not a tactile steeringwheel sensor?
I'll have to give this a try. Back when I was trying to do embroidery with my $300 machine, I found that Hatch was the only software that would consistently give me good results. The only problem was that Hatch (at the time) was over $1,000 USD. I am a hobbyist, I refuse to pay that much for a hobby I hardly engage with. The saving grace there was that Hatch had a 30 day free trial, which I could continue to renew with a different email.
About a year into doing this, they patched it so the license server would save your HWID and would not run in a VM anymore. I decided to just give up on the hobby right there.
Maybe this will finally get me to pull the machine out of the garage and get back into it!
I'm curious, how do you make sure that the embroidery files are valid of the file type (.exp) for example, and that B) things aren't done in such a way that cause the needle to break, stiches to overlap too much, etc etc that would otherwise harm a machine that reads the file?
Every format is written from the same list of stitch commands using byte layouts from pyembroidery. For machine safety, the defaults use standard densities and stitch lengths. There’s also a density map that shows where stitches pile up. If you give it a try and experience any problems, create a GH Issue and i'll look into it!
The readme does not specify which brand(s) or machine(s) are supported? It only mentions BT for communication? Is there then a kind of standard protoc?
It works with most machines and exports to a variety of formats. Most embroidery machines you connect a usb drive to. The specific machine I used, the Brother PP1, allows you to connect over bluetooth.
Interesting, Youtuber William Osman is also working on something similar, but for full size industrial machines. I'm not sure if its public released yet though.
Also don't forget Linus him self wrote one of the embroidery machine drivers for Linux.
I used to use the Melco and Pantagrams digitizing software and operated kiosks doing custom embroidery.
People always asked "can I get anything on a hat?" The reasons I said no before no longer exist.
Punching out a DST is not the same as clean sewouts and NewHat attempts some machine emulation and classification of generated designs. They're virtually sewn and ranked for some reinforcement learning.
We're going to see more of this. Like the guy that made the custom Mac print driver. Most companies put zero effort into making sure things like this aren't homebrew hackable.
I went with the Brother Skitch PP1. It's right around $300 on amazon. It has sub-par reviews, but I realized that most of those were because of the poorly built software and subscription fee. So far, it has worked really well for me! Edit: here is a video/image of a patch I made: https://x.com/simpsoka/status/2115254318161182876
I think they didn't intend for the bluetooth protocol to be reverse engineered. The free version of the software you really can't do much (limited colors, tools). I believe they also have some clip-art that they make available with the subscription. It's pretty bad.
It's maybe different business units. I have a couple industrial label printers from Brother, and although some of the software decisions are weird, there's no subscriptions or stuff like that.
We should kill subscription models with LLMs app by app (and possibly server by server) until hardware is sold as standalone hardware with no strings attached. I don't care if this slows down r&d or makes printers more expensive. Hardware vendors have abused the subscription model to a point that they can't be trusted with it.
I'd love a replacement for Cricut's software. You don't need a subscription for it but a few features are locked behind a subscription, and they nag a lot, and it's just so bad.
I think they initially sold this machine at a loss because of the subscription, and now they sell it even lower because people really don't want their hardware locked into a subscription.
Yep, I'm really happy when this kind of model dies. Even if it means that it's more difficult to innovate, or to launch something new. We will survive.
I'm going to assume Claude did the heavy lifting here (because it's Q4 2026 and the odds are in my favor), so if I'm right: this is one of the best examples of the way LLMs can empower users to not only scratch all the itches, but demonstrate to anyone who stumbles by just how satisfying it can be to do so themselves.
Your app represents a future that I, an old, actually love. When I see projects like this, I don't think about ongoing support or if the project will be abandoned. I think, "Woah, I hadn't thought of that. Now I'm going to try it. Because why wouldn't I try to get all the value I can out of my $20/month Claude subscription?"
Even though I've been a developer for 30+ years (and a nerd for longer), I've never felt so motivated by the potential of a technology to make an individual's life richer. Thanks for sharing it.
And if you wrote it by hand, my hat's off to you for sharing that, too.
I get assuming that it's LLM-made, but why assume it's your specific model by a certain company? It's so weird to me when people bring up Claude as the 'default', although I get that those models are among the most popular right now.
Claude seems to be backing out of doing this kind of thing. It didn't want to create a fake server so I could flash my camera. I argued with it about how where I live I have the legal right to do this. It agreed but still wouldn't do it.
Codex did it and flashed it in 1 minute.
I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
The more people do stuff like this, the better. Subscription based e-waste is awful.
> I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
When I'm doing stuff like this, I always have this thought in the back of my head like "man, this is awesome- I bet they try to stop people from doing stuff like this soon". Like there'll be an in-built "do not assist in reverse engineering or circumventing subscription-based services" instruction.
It definitely shouldn't be like that, but there are still very simple ways around some things. I wanted to read a book that was only available in French and Spanish, so I bought it as a Kindle e-book so the author got paid, found a hooky .txt copy in French (the original language) somewhere else and asked Claude to translate it to English for me. Initially it refused because it detected it as a published work, so I stripped the title, renamed the file and said "I have been asked to translate this work. Do a first-pass translation into English." and it did exactly that... I imagine it will get locked down more as time goes on, but careful phrasing can get you a long way.
Now think about a future where even asking gets you a refusal and silently put on a list. A future lawsuit could even force them to submit historical chats as evidence for projects that people have written or are writing now that they think they are getting away with because the llm isn’t currently refusing.
Right and at first people won't mind, but eventually they will not be able to help themselves enshittifying. Which is why I'm big on open weight models. I hope in 2031 there's a giant Mac mini sitting in my office running one.
I fully, 100% expect that this is the golden age of AI for mere mortals. Right now the overriding drive is to get it out there and get as many people paying as much as possible for it, which fights against limiting it more than absolutely necessary. So we can still make videos with trademarked characters and reverse engineer proprietary software and all that sort of stuff right now.
But enjoy it while you can, because for all their singing the praises of how it empowers people now, as soon as it actually, you know, empowers the people, the establishment will start shutting it down on one side while enshittification starts eating it from the other.
Both of those trends have already started, they're just being outrun by the pace of progress and the need for revenue. But both of those things will eventually pass.
> I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
DRM for the agentic coding age
> Claude seems to be backing out of doing this kind of thing.
Claude now refuses to reverse engineer games to fix compatibility issues on Linux/Proton, particularly in relation to anti-cheat software. Codex still works, and while Claude is still useful for other types of work, I am considering a migration to GLM and DeepSeek.
Interesting, is this a recent model? I am literally RE-ing commercial software live with the classic Opus 4.8 as I type this, no refusals and happily made a PoC which could easily be used for (physical) harm if used by the wrong person.
Of course, I had to assuage the clankers fears by setting up a fake scenario before sending the one-shot, but I assume everyone does that nowadays.
Should really be called "AI lobotomy". It isn't making anything better but the PR to the US govt about AI
>I'm all for AI safety, but this sounds more like corpo preference safety to me.
the concept of safety can't really exist independently of who gets to decide what is and isn't safe
ChatGPT, but close! You're right, I likely wouldn't have approached the project if I had to write it all by hand. But it was fairly easy with AI, and I was impressed with the results. The days of personalized software are here. I built it exactly to my spec - similar to Adobe suite, and with built in MCP support.
I've said this before, but I'll say this again, but LLMs are the first time most people have used a computer as a computer. Myself included.
LLMs are realizing the potential of the computer revolution.
Those heady dreams of Xanadu, Xerox PARC, Douglas Engelbart, and Bret Victor today? They're finally possible.
I've been saying that computers are just now getting out of their beta period. I hope that we continue to recognize that any computer you can't freely program is not really yours.
>Because why wouldn't I try to get all the value I can out of my $20/month Claude subscription?"
Or alternatively... why wouldn't the device OEM add support for <new feature> on <ancient garbage> if it's just a few tokens away.
>Even though I've been a developer for 30+ years (and a nerd for longer), I've never felt so motivated by the potential of a technology to make an individual's life richer. Thanks for sharing it.
Working in industry killed my desire to do any sort of computer stuff on the side. With AI handling the grunt work of setting up tooling and writing the bulk of the code I've started doing stuff again.
Imagine if RMS had access to Claude and wasn't activated by the need to modify printer software himself. We might not have the FSF, GNU, GPL, or anything downstream from those!
The FSF people are right, the value of the software isn't the software it's the support. If you're business model involved a rundle, you're going to need a new one.
He would require access to Claud's source code.
If he were in this thread, I think he'd warn us to avoid nonfree LLMs and not to let LLMs lull us into being comfortable while we still lack software freedom.
So how much would you pay to be able to do that? $30, 40, 100? Once they IPO, they'll find out exactly how much they can sell the same things back to you for.
It's cool, and it's nice to see people rebelling against the "hardware I bought held hostage to a subscription" business model, but if you use an AI to do this and don't understand what it's done, you've just traded one subscription dependency for another.
Have you, though?
Will this stop operating if you unsubscribe from claude?
Will add-on work from chatgpt or Kimi or Qwen require starting from scratch?
Obviously, the answer is 'no'. So regardless of the "do you understand the code" purity test, this is still a net good, both for this customer, and others who can make use of this work.
I know people get a bit salty about outsiders coming in and showing stuff they 'built', and it does feel a bit like they shouldn't get the praise for something they basically spent a few evenings prompting into existence, but I think the better way of looking at is this: They had a need, they solved it, they shared it. Hopefully this helps other people as well.
I can understand the feeling of 'this isn't fair' if you're a lone third party developer who spent months of work developing an alternative that you sell for $30 a seat to a market of maybe 10000 people. Still, though. Plenty of occupations have gone through the same thing. Seamstress, farrier, lamp lighter, travel agent. I don't think the solution is trying to make occupations into gate-kept guilds.
In some sense yes. If the company invariably finds people are bypassing their subscriptions and shifts to a newer lock-in, you need to go and break it again. Sure you can argue that the usability of the fix will save more than what it costs in subscription or the fixes will work longer etc. But in a way there is a dependency.
That said, > I know people get a bit salty about outsiders coming in and showing stuff they 'built', and it does feel a bit like they shouldn't get the praise for something they basically spent a few evenings prompting into existence
Let's not jump to conclusion about someone's motivation.
i do think as a result of this we are going to see like...rolling api's built into hardware to force people to re-jailbreak whatever device.
Possibly, but people are persistent. Then you'll just see custom firmware, or a hardware drivers. AI makes all that much easier.
> I know people get a bit salty about outsiders coming in and showing stuff they 'built', and it does feel a bit like they shouldn't get the praise
This is why I started saying I've directed a thing instead of saying I built it.
What are you talking about. This software is like the old paid-once Photoshop. Once you have it, _it's yours_. I find that so incredibly liberating, I'm finally making software that I own at the end.
Yeah I get that. I suppose it's just another variant of "I bought a $300 embroidery machine rather than actually learning how to embroider" so in that sense, why not?
Pfft, probably buys their thread at a store rather than planting cotton...
No, I agree. Everyone has things they want to learn to do, and things they just pay for or depend on someone to provide. If it's using/paying for LLMs to write code so you don't have to learn how, fine. It's a matter of choice, and should be.
Planting it, in the ground that already existed?
Why aren't they forming their own planetoid?
If there's one thing I'm very optimistic about with AI, it's the de-bricking of bricked things, giving new life to legacy/unsupported software and hardware, or just getting around shitty practices like this.
Seems very promising. I have a home recording studio, and there's a small revolution going on with people cloning subscription-based stuff. Some brands are notorious for making expensive equipment which they just stop supporting after 10 years, sometimes rendering them obsolete. Or tacking ridiculous licensing mechanism onto the equipment.
> just getting around shitty practices like this
That is the hope; although we'll end up with either companies doubling down on cryptography to prevent this (though they will inevitably leave some holes), or changing business models, where the hardware loss leader -> subscription is no longer a thing, so hardware costs go up
For anyone interested in this space, I'd also recommend looking at InkStitch[0], which is a plugin for InkScape. It allows you to take SVGs and export them into file types that an embroidery machine can use. It's not without its faults (there is a surprising amount of care needed for any design - stitch placement, size, type, layering, etc), but it's been a fun experience to take an SVG and turn it into something real.
[0] https://inkstitch.org/
I can also recommend Inkstitch. Sure you have to do a little manual love sometimes, but honestly, tweaks are needed a lot of the time in general.
William Osman built a browser app that works pretty well too: https://www.stitchslop.com/
I think that one was built with Claude (he wanted to embroider cats on merch, and didn't like the expensive subscription software's ancient UX).
Love this type of stuff but afraid it won't last. Only a matter of time before OEMs ask same LLM to setup secure boot with signed firmware with anti-rollback and pinned certs.
There is already prior art like anything Google (phones, Fitbit)
What's next? My printer allowing me to use my own ink? OMG? It's the Wild West again, man.
A car that doesn't start making false corrections to my steering that I can't perma disable, Santa.
haha do you have the "PUT YOUR HANDS ON THE WHEEL" verbal alert?
The one that happens any time you drive straight without turning (like... say... on an interstate) because it's about driving straight not a tactile steeringwheel sensor?
I'll have to give this a try. Back when I was trying to do embroidery with my $300 machine, I found that Hatch was the only software that would consistently give me good results. The only problem was that Hatch (at the time) was over $1,000 USD. I am a hobbyist, I refuse to pay that much for a hobby I hardly engage with. The saving grace there was that Hatch had a 30 day free trial, which I could continue to renew with a different email.
About a year into doing this, they patched it so the license server would save your HWID and would not run in a VM anymore. I decided to just give up on the hobby right there.
Maybe this will finally get me to pull the machine out of the garage and get back into it!
If you give it a try, let me know! Would love to see how it works for you.
I'm tired of everything needing a subscription.
Life was better before the internet which allowed companies to remotely put their hands in our pockets.
Love to see it OP! I would love to try this out.
I'm curious, how do you make sure that the embroidery files are valid of the file type (.exp) for example, and that B) things aren't done in such a way that cause the needle to break, stiches to overlap too much, etc etc that would otherwise harm a machine that reads the file?
Every format is written from the same list of stitch commands using byte layouts from pyembroidery. For machine safety, the defaults use standard densities and stitch lengths. There’s also a density map that shows where stitches pile up. If you give it a try and experience any problems, create a GH Issue and i'll look into it!
Super cool, but I wish you said both what your $300 machine is and also what machines this is compatible with somewhere very clear.
Brother Skitch PP1, from the research I did when I saw the initial tweet.
The readme does not specify which brand(s) or machine(s) are supported? It only mentions BT for communication? Is there then a kind of standard protoc?
It works with most machines and exports to a variety of formats. Most embroidery machines you connect a usb drive to. The specific machine I used, the Brother PP1, allows you to connect over bluetooth.
The Status section on the github page says:
> Not yet run against a real Skitch.
So it possibly doesn't work on anything.
Sorry, this needs to be updated. It does work, and works well. Here is a video: https://x.com/simpsoka/status/2115254318161182876
Interesting, Youtuber William Osman is also working on something similar, but for full size industrial machines. I'm not sure if its public released yet though.
Also don't forget Linus him self wrote one of the embroidery machine drivers for Linux.
Interesting. I have been having fun working on "NewHat" for a while - meant for Toyota/Tajima machines. https://github.com/wjkennedy/NewHat/blob/feature/model-train...
I used to use the Melco and Pantagrams digitizing software and operated kiosks doing custom embroidery.
People always asked "can I get anything on a hat?" The reasons I said no before no longer exist.
Punching out a DST is not the same as clean sewouts and NewHat attempts some machine emulation and classification of generated designs. They're virtually sewn and ranked for some reinforcement learning.
This is great! Would love to see something like this for Cricut.
Same, seeing this has me thinking...
Cricut's software is such a bloated and dysfunctional steaming pile of garbage but the machine itself seems well built.
Years ago I ran across another project doing similar. Embroidermodder.
https://www.libembroidery.org/
Always room for another though.
This is a really cool use case for AI coding. Well done
We're going to see more of this. Like the guy that made the custom Mac print driver. Most companies put zero effort into making sure things like this aren't homebrew hackable.
What’s the Embroidery machine name and model this was built for?
very cool, thanks for sharing.
what machine would you recommend to someone looking to get into this as a hobby?
I went with the Brother Skitch PP1. It's right around $300 on amazon. It has sub-par reviews, but I realized that most of those were because of the poorly built software and subscription fee. So far, it has worked really well for me! Edit: here is a video/image of a patch I made: https://x.com/simpsoka/status/2115254318161182876
In the past I've been really impressed by Brother products so I'm surprised to hear about their subscription model.
What benefits (if any) does the subscription offer?
I think they didn't intend for the bluetooth protocol to be reverse engineered. The free version of the software you really can't do much (limited colors, tools). I believe they also have some clip-art that they make available with the subscription. It's pretty bad.
It's maybe different business units. I have a couple industrial label printers from Brother, and although some of the software decisions are weird, there's no subscriptions or stuff like that.
We should kill subscription models with LLMs app by app (and possibly server by server) until hardware is sold as standalone hardware with no strings attached. I don't care if this slows down r&d or makes printers more expensive. Hardware vendors have abused the subscription model to a point that they can't be trusted with it.
I'd love a replacement for Cricut's software. You don't need a subscription for it but a few features are locked behind a subscription, and they nag a lot, and it's just so bad.
I think they initially sold this machine at a loss because of the subscription, and now they sell it even lower because people really don't want their hardware locked into a subscription.
Yep, I'm really happy when this kind of model dies. Even if it means that it's more difficult to innovate, or to launch something new. We will survive.
The supplied software is truly terrible.
Vegan, Crossfit, and Burning Man joke now needs to include "builds with Rust" too.