I can see you're A/B testing some different hero text.
I got:
> Write a config, not a conversation
Which I found let me wondering - "What is this thing?"
I refreshed a few times to the variations, and while some were better, I feel like your hero could do with being less pithy, and more plain explanation of what it is.
What is there not to understand? AI is booming right now. People are trying to get in on the gold rush and/or trying to sell pick axes to the miners. There is a ton of fertile ground for anyone that wants to try something, so it's being explored.
People want to build something with the newfound productivity, but it turns out that software development always had a high leverage against potential impact - coding was always relatively cheap. That means there is in fact no backlog of great products that could have been built if we only had 10x productivity. The only spots where "missing products" can be found are mostly around AI itself.
IMHO the reason is because engineers can write software but not always solve real problems. It is just easier to put stuff in code to do things with computers. This is the comfort zone. But coming up with something that solves a valuable end-user problem requires understanding what this is.
I've been through this thought process many times and I am still struggling (you can check my profile as to why).
I wish we all collectively worked on one project, especially on an orchestrator tool, where the groundwork is important. people can build on it whatever they want, just dont re-invent the orchestrator!
I can see you're A/B testing some different hero text.
I got:
> Write a config, not a conversation
Which I found let me wondering - "What is this thing?" I refreshed a few times to the variations, and while some were better, I feel like your hero could do with being less pithy, and more plain explanation of what it is.
In case anyone is interested, agentic platform I have been working on for awhile.
https://kern-ai.com/
Can you give any more details about this, why we might be compelled to try it out?
looks pretty cool, but as all AI landing pages do, it suffers from not enough contrast. you might want to lighten the darker text shades ;)
why are there so many autonomous ai agent orchestration systems? too much! I don't understand! Please explain
What is there not to understand? AI is booming right now. People are trying to get in on the gold rush and/or trying to sell pick axes to the miners. There is a ton of fertile ground for anyone that wants to try something, so it's being explored.
People want to build something with the newfound productivity, but it turns out that software development always had a high leverage against potential impact - coding was always relatively cheap. That means there is in fact no backlog of great products that could have been built if we only had 10x productivity. The only spots where "missing products" can be found are mostly around AI itself.
IMHO the reason is because engineers can write software but not always solve real problems. It is just easier to put stuff in code to do things with computers. This is the comfort zone. But coming up with something that solves a valuable end-user problem requires understanding what this is.
I've been through this thought process many times and I am still struggling (you can check my profile as to why).
You can try as well.
What are the best applications for AI automation?
> What are the best applications for AI automation?
A robot that walks round cleaning your house and he never gets tired and he can go the shops and do what you want and repairs his self
> What are the best applications for AI automation?
Sex bots
[dead]
I wish we all collectively worked on one project, especially on an orchestrator tool, where the groundwork is important. people can build on it whatever they want, just dont re-invent the orchestrator!
It’s what the cool kids are doing these days. It’ll pass. Also it’s quite fun to build things around agents and watch them go off to work.
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]